Ruth
The subject line in the email stated: “Anoka Library Featured Author Program: Reply by 10/31.”
I clicked it open, and the first line read, “Dear Ruth, Congratulations! You have been selected as one of Anoka County Library’s 2025 Featured Authors.”
Wow, truly unexpected, since I didn’t start writing fiction books until 2021.
Attached to the email was a questionnaire for me to fill out. The information would be used by our Anoka County Library in 2025 to promote my work and help readers connect with me.
One of the questions was: “Tell us a little about your writing process. What kind of research do you do, and how long do you spend researching before beginning a book? What is the most difficult part of your artistic process?”
Hmm. How should I answer? After some thought, I jotted down the following.
Writing Process:
My writing process varies depending on whether I am working on scientific publications or creative writing. With a strong foundation in research and analysis, I often start by outlining the main ideas and themes I want to explore. Creative writing allows me more freedom to weave in elements of fictional storytelling with scientific accuracy. I find it helpful to set aside dedicated time for writing each day, which helps maintain momentum and fosters creativity.
Research:
As a biochemist, meticulous research is second nature to me, whether I’m working on a scientific book or integrating creative concepts into a fictional narrative. Before beginning a book, I spend a considerable amount of time delving into relevant literature, both scientific and creative, to ensure a well-rounded understanding. The length of the research phase varies depending on the complexity of the topic, but it often spans several weeks. I also enjoy speaking with friends in different fields, which can offer new perspectives and enrich my work.
Most Difficult Part of the Artistic Process:
Transitioning from scientific writing to creative writing presents its own set of challenges. The most difficult part for me has been learning to let go of the structured rigor that scientific writing demands and embracing the more fluid and imaginative aspects of creative storytelling. It involves allowing myself to experiment with different narrative techniques and character developments, which can feel uncertain at times. Also, balancing accuracy with creativity, particularly when dealing with scientific themes in fiction, is an ongoing challenge.
What do you think of my response? Do you have any suggestions?
